法規內容

下載法規原始檔

 

國立成功大學人文社會科學中心 研究計畫審查申覆作業要點
National Cheng Kung University Guidelines for Appeal to Research Project Review by Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences

 99年4月8日 98學年度第 4次審議委員會會議通過

99年11月3日 99學年度第 2次審議委員會會議通過

國立成功大學人文社會科學中心 研究計畫審查申覆作業要點

National Cheng Kung University

Guidelines for Appeal to Research Project Review by Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences

 

99年4月8日 98學年度第 4次審議委員會會議通過

99年11月3日 99學年度第 2次審議委員會會議通過

Approved by 4th Meeting of Review Committee of 2009 School Year on 8 April 2010

Approved by 2nd Meeting of Review Committee of 2010 School Year on 3 November 2010

 

一、人文社會科學中心(以下簡稱本中心)為處理本中心補助研究計畫申請案審查異議之申覆案件,以建立客觀、公正之審查制度,特訂定本要點。

1.        The Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences (hereinafter the “Center”) has established these Guidelines to build an objective and fair review system to process cases of appeal against decisions on research project applications for subsidy by the Center.

二、本中心補助研究計畫申請案經審查未獲通過者,計畫主持人(即申覆人)對審查結果如有異議,得敍明理由向本中心提出申覆。但如該案審查分數,皆未達75分者不得申請申覆,或已獲審查通過補助之申請案,不得提出申覆。

2.        If an application to seek subsidy from the Center for a research project is rejected and if the project coordinator (i.e., the appellant) objects to the review decision, he/she may state his/her reasons and file an appeal with the Center.  However, no appeal may be filed if the review score for the case is below 75, or if subsidy has been approved for the proposal.

三、申覆人應於接獲本中心補助研究計畫申請案審查結果後15天內填具申覆書,送交本中心提出申覆,逾期不予受理。

3.        The appellant shall complete an appeal form within 15 days from receipt of the result of review by the Center for research project subsidy application and submit it to the Center to file the appeal.  No appeal after such deadline will be processed.

四、申覆書應由申覆人依本中心製作之表格,逐項填寫。其內容包括:

(1) 基本資料。

(2) 申覆說明:申覆人應就原申請案所提計畫書範圍內有異議之審查結果,提出具體說明,如有補充資料,得一併提出。

4.        The appellant shall use the form prepared by the Center and complete each item, including:

(1)   Basic information.

(2)   Explanations for Appeal: The appellant shall provide specific explanations about the review results to which he/she objects within the scope of the original proposal.  Any supplemental information may also be provided.

五、申覆案經受理後,即由本中心計畫審查小組將申覆書及初審委員意見送請專家二至三名進行審查。審查結果經提報本中心計畫審查小組會審議後,由本中心函復。

前項審查作業期間,除有特殊情形者外,自申覆案截止收件日起二個月內函復。

5.        After an appeal is accepted, the Project Review Team of the Center will submit the appeal and the members’ comments from initial review to 2 to 3 experts for review.  After the results of the review are provided to the meeting of the Project Review Team for review, the Center shall provide a reply by letter.

In relation to the above review period, unless there are special circumstances, a letter reply will be provided within 2 months from the appeal deadline.

六、本要點經審議委員會會議通過後施行,修正時亦同。

6.        These Guidelines, including any amendment hereto, are implemented following approval by the meeting of the Review Committee.