100年 04月01日生科中心99學年度評議委員會會議通過
Passed and approved for reference by the 4th Meeting of the Faculty Review Committee on April 1, 2011.
100年09月02日生科中心100學年度評議委員會會議修正
Amended in the Faculty Review Committee on September 2, 2011.
100年10月21日教師評審委員會議修正後核備
Amended in the Faculty and Research Fellow Review Committee of Academic Year 2011 of the Center for Center for Bioscience and Biotechnology on October 21, 2011.
101年1月10日第4次教師評審委員會議通過核備
Amended in the Faculty and Research Fellow Review Committee of Academic Year 2010 of the Center for Center for Bioscience and Biotechnology on January 10, 2012.
|
|
國立成功大學生科中心研究人員升等審查評分表(甲表)
National Cheng Kung University Center for Bioscience and Biotechnology
Research Fellow Promotions Review Form (A)
|
著作編號
Publication No.
|
|
所屬系所
Department
|
生物科技中心
Center for Bioscience
and Biotechnology
|
送審等級
Promotion to |
專任__研究員
Full-time ____________ research
fellow
|
姓名
Name |
|
|
代表著作名稱
Name of representative publication
|
|
|
※滿分為100分，研究員80分；副研究員75分為及格，未達標準者為不及格。
※Full score is 100 marks. The passing mark is 80 for research fellows and 75 for associate research fellows. Scores below these
marks are a fail.
|
評 分 項 目 及 標 準
Rating Items and Criteria |
總分
Total Score
|
項 目
Item |
服務(5年內)
如策劃統籌研討會、演講、學程開設及業務推展等
Service (within 5 years)
Such as planning symposia and speeches, giving programs, and facilitating business development |
研究(5年內)
如期刊論文、產學、專利、授權等
Research (within 5 years)
Such as journal papers, academia-industry collaboration, patents, and licenses |
|
|
__研究員
research fellow
|
40 % |
60 % |
100% |
得 分
Score |
|
|
|
|
審查人簽章
Signature of reviewer
|
|
審畢日期
Date of review
|
年 月 日 |
※審查評定基準：
※Rating baseline
1.研究員：應在該學術及研究領域內有獨特及持續性著作並有重要具體之貢獻者。
Research Fellow: Insightful and continuous publications in respective academic and research area(s) of specialization with important and substantial contributions.
2.副研究員：應在該學術及研究領域內有持續性著作並有具體之貢獻者。
Associate Research Fellow: Continuous publications in respective academic and research area(s) of specialization with substantial contributions.
國立成功大學生科中心研究人員升等審查評分表(乙表)
National Cheng Kung University Center for Bioscience and Biotechnology
Research Fellow Promotions Review Form (B)
|
著作編號
Publication No.
|
|
所屬系所
Department
|
生物科技中心
Center for Bioscience
and Biotechnology
|
送審等級
Promotion to
|
專任__研究員
Full-time ____________ research
fellow
|
姓名
Name
|
|
|
代表著作名稱
Name of the representative publication
|
|
|
審查意見：(本頁提供送審人參考，係可公開文件，審查意見請就研究主題、研究方法及能力、學術及實務貢獻、個人學術與專業之整體成就等項目評述，務請具體明確，可以條列方式敘述)
Review Comment: (Information contained in this section is open for the reference of applicants. Please comment in terms of the topic(s), methodology(ies), and capacity of research, academic and practical contributions, as well as the overall individual academic and professional achievements of applicants. Please be concrete, exact and itemize comments where appropriate.)
|
|
優點
Advantages
|
缺點
Disadvantages
|
|
☐ 獨立的研究方向
Independent research direction.
☐ 內容充實見解創新
Rich research contents and innovative interpretations.
☐ 所獲結論具學術或實用價值
Conclusions are academically or practically valuable.
☐ 研究能力佳
Great research capacity.
☐ 取材豐富組織嚴謹
Rich materials and well organized.
☐ 五年內研究成果優良
Excellent research achievements in the last five years.
其他：
Others:
|
☐ 無特殊創見
Lack of original ideas.
☐ 學術或實用價值不高
Low academic or practical value.
☐ 析論欠深入
Further discussions required.
☐ 內容不完整
Incomplete contents.
☐ 研究方法及理論基礎均弱
Weak methodology and theoretical basis.
☐ 不符合該類科學術論文寫作格式
Noncompliance with the writing style of
respective academic papers.
☐ 五年內研究成績差
Poor research performance in the last five years.
☐ 違反學術倫理
Violation of academic ethics and integrity.
☐ 著作有抄襲之嫌
Allegation of plagiarism
（請於審查意見欄指出具體事實）
(please specify facts in the Review Comment section).
其他：
Others:
|
|
總評
General Comment
|
|
※滿分為100分，研究員80分；副研究員75分為及格，未達標準者為不及格。
※Full score is 100 marks. The passing mark is 80 for research fellows and 75 for associate research fellows. Scores below these
marks are a fail.
本人評定本案為 ☐ 及格。 ☐ 不及格。 ☐ 不受理，屬下列情形之：
I hereby determine that this application is ☐ PASS ☐ FAIL ☐ REJECTED for the following reasons:
☐ 1. 屬以整理、增刪、組合或編排他人著作而成之編著送審之情形（如翻譯、教材研製或編著等）。
The work is the result of re-arrangement, adaptation, compilation, or re-setting the works of others (e.g. translations, production of teaching materials, or compilation).
☐ 2. 屬學位論文或其一部份且無一定程度之創新。
The work is a degree thesis/dissertation or part of it without innovation at any level.
|
|